Monthly Archives: May 2021

Is northern Siberia primed for more record-breaking summer heat? It’s still too early to draw conclusions, but there have already been a few really hot days in places, and today is another. We’ll look at it and also at certain … Continue reading →

This letter will be devoted mainly to preserving certain images for archiving purposes. Year-to-year comparisons, if available, can be especially helpful in determining long-term trends. Month-by-month changes can have similar importance for some images. I think of the upper-level air … Continue reading →

“Carl’s theory of precipitable water’s greenhouse effect.”  I have yet to think of a better name for the theory that will encompass all of the main points that I believe are not otherwise described with the same high amount of … Continue reading →

More thoughts about Carl’s Theory, which I happen to own and have every right to clarify or add to in depth while it is still in the incubation stage. Broadly speaking, the theory is about something not even recognized as … Continue reading →

Let’s talk about precipitable water (PW), the primary subject of Carl’s Theory. The features of PW were investigated in great depth and at great length for over a century, leading to conclusions that science knew all there was to know … Continue reading →

Friday’s letter described the importance of precipitable water’s (PW’s) greenhouse energy effect on surface temperatures in the Arctic region as a whole, which means everything inside the Arctic Circle. The Arctic Ocean, excluding the outer seas, accounts for about half … Continue reading →

Carl’s theory of precipitable water’s greenhouse effect contains a number of observations of a scientific nature that are otherwise not covered in any scientific literature, or in published reports of any kind apart from this online journal of letters during … Continue reading →

The two most salient of claims made by Carl’s Theory, as summarized in yesterday’s letter, should readily be illustrated on any given day by using images that come up on Today’s Weather Maps, so let’s go there. Today there is … Continue reading →

In Carl’s theory of precipitable water’s greenhouse effect (Carl’s Theory) we find that the theory has two main branches, which are separate but closely related. The first branch shows that the greenhouse effect of precipitable water (PW) changes in a … Continue reading →

What does Carl’s Theory have to say about the future? As the theory now stands, I don’t think it will make it any easier to create specific predictions by putting actual numbers on future temperature estimates. There are too many … Continue reading →