Monthly Archives: September 2021

Before continuing to expand upon the water vapor issues, I need to add a bit more to the interpretation of the odd-looking chart posted at the top of yesterday’s letter. Best that I post it again today: You may have … Continue reading →

More analysis of Hansen’s July report. We’ll start with a close look at the goofy-looking chart that turns out to have a key role in his primary thesis. It’s all about a group of important “forcings,” in this case identified … Continue reading →

More comments on the Hansen report (day 5). When you dig into the details of this report, and think about what he is telling us, and what it means, it gets more and more interesting. I can’t get my mind … Continue reading →

Continuing my commentary (see the last three letters) on James Hansen’s truly unique report and predictions published in July.  I have been giving it a lot of thought.  Hansen has been a life-long student of aerosol effects on climate, which … Continue reading →

Another letter (the 3rd) devoted to Hansen’s prediction about the effects of sulfate aerosol removal.  Hansen has a record of outstanding accomplishments in climate science, including his past predictions.  He is a totally independent thinker, far removed from today’s climate … Continue reading →

If you have not read yesterday’s letter I would urge you to drop whatever else you have in mind and do so now. The new revelations from James Hansen have come as a wake-up call for me, enough so that … Continue reading →

James Hansen is perhaps the most renowned of all modern climate scientists, and also one of the most controversial.  His voluminous publishings have generally contained new and interesting material and have never shied away from making predictions, most of which … Continue reading →

Carl’s theory, based entirely on consideration of the greenhouse energy effects of precipitable water water (PW), is broken down into three parts.  The first part is focused on evidence that the effect is always proportional to the amount of PW … Continue reading →

Today’s letter is a followup from the one on Friday. I’ve  designed it in a way that could encourage you to show it to someone you know who is a scientist, or has the curiosity required of a scientist.  Today … Continue reading →

More than anything else, Carl’s theory relies on the discovery that total precipitable water (PW) concentrations in the atmosphere have a strong and consistent relationship with surface temperatures directly below. This applies best to any single location for any one … Continue reading →