- By Carl Campbell
Contact me with any questions or comments at: campcarl@yahoo.com Subscribe
Search
Archives
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
Monthly Archives: August 2021
Climate Letter #2003
Continued from yesterday’s letter, concerning the way claims made by Carl’s theory, if accepted, would affect the structure of fundamentals currently entrenched in the curriculum of the science of climate change. A concise and well-written history of how current fundamental … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #2003
Climate Letter #2002
Carl’s theory makes a number of claims that are not recognized by any scientific curriculum. Assuming they were all correct, how would the science of climate change be changed? Would it be “new,” or just updated? Updated is probably a … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #2002
Climate Letter #2001
Yesterday’s letter stressed the importance of understanding the movement of precipitable water (PW) concentrations in the troposphere’s upper-level wind system. Carl’s theory of PW’s greenhouse effect is mostly built around things we can learn from close observations of all the … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #2001
Climate Letter #2000
Thanks to The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, this story found its way into my computer this morning. It is one of the most alarming things I have ever read about what is happening to our planet, and utterly convincing: … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #2000
Climate Letter #1999
If I ever gave the impression that the greenhouse energy generated by clouds added something to the planetary total, I’m sorry. It was a mistake. The energy is real, all right, but every bit of cloud formation involves a loss … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #1999
Climate Letter #1998
Why is it important for scientists to fully understand the greenhouse energy effect of precipitable water (PW)? It all boils down to one major consideration: because we have the ability to measure the effects of this energy on surface temperatures … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #1998
Climate Letter #1997
The new IPCC report covering the physical science of climate change has been published If you have not seen a good review of its content here is one that is reasonably thorough and makes it easy to understand the real … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #1997
Climate Letter #1996
When sea surface temperatures get warmer the mount of evaporation increases. No one has any doubts about this. But what about the rate of evaporation? Does it also change? I have not seen any relevant data, or other kind of … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #1996
Climate Letter #1995
These are heady days for climate watchers. The NH is supposed to be past the peak of summer heating for the year, usually in mid-July, but that is not stopping some dramatic new developments from happening. I have lots of … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #1995
Climate Letter #1994
North America has its own version of the Persian Gulf, creating exactly the same kind of effects on land temperatures directly to the north. The Gulf of California is positioned at almost the same latitude as the Persian Gulf, is … Continue reading
Posted in Daily Climate Letters
Comments Off on Climate Letter #1994