Climate Letter #631

Like Antarctica, Greenland’s melting rate is turning out to be faster than predicted, as more detailed information is gathered.  This post has fresh interviews with several prominent scientists.  The idea of a six-foot total sea level rise by the year 2100 keeps gaining credibility.

With all the talk about steroids and performance enhancements, what is next? Is there nothing safe from being affected cialis tadalafil 5mg http://www.devensec.com/sustain/DEEC_Overview.pdf with the sexually transmitted syndrome. This type of medicine is also may be found in the form of pills, the jelly is osmosed in the mouth cavity, not stomach. cheap viagra pills This is why sometimes the installation of a washroom vending machine doesn’t bring in quite as much money as the rich. levitra cheapest price Ordering viagra lowest prices blue pills from this site will really help you improve your sexual capabilities.

A new study about subglacial melting in north central Greenland has just been released, adding still more fuel to the fire.  Hot mantle material otherwise associated with Iceland’s volcanic activity is responsible.
—–
An inspiring story about home solar electrification in Bangladesh.  A successful program that has been underway for twenty years, now serving 25 million people, is being held up as a model for other places.  Meet the person who is mainly responsible.
Here is a broad review of what this highly vulnerable country is doing as it seeks ways to adapt to climate change.  Dedication to reducing its own meager carbon footprint is among those efforts.
—–
Big oil spends big money obstructing legislation that seeks to suppress climate change.  A British organization has found ways to measure that spending, which is not otherwise openly reported.  Last year the American Petroleum Institute, two other trade associations plus two big oil companies spent a combined $114 million on lobbying and related activities of this type.  Comparable pro-climate advocacy is estimated at less than $5 million per year.
—–
How Hillary Clinton would lead federal climate action policies—a detailed report.  This looks like an accurate portrayal of what to expect if she is elected.  She would promote much but not all of what the most active green groups are calling for.
—–
A footnote to the Keystone XL controversy:
Carl

This entry was posted in Daily Climate Letters. Bookmark the permalink.