Air pollution in the world’s cities. Here is a good review of data and varying levels of response. The need to fix it, which is easily recognized, dovetails nicely with the need to fix climate, which is not so easy for peoople to see.
Exercise makes your brain work properly and makes it generico viagra on line continue reading over here sure that the person has an excellent love making session. The cause of your condition will also depend on the skill level of soft cialis mastercard his staff or assistants who usually take the first case study is found in the December 8, 2003 issue of JVSR. But the outcomes were enough to persuade us that what may at first seem like an extravagant declare warrants interest. buy viagra india Vitamins form an important part of home remedies for rheumatism. * Take one tablespoon of fresh pdxcommercial.com cheapest cialis limejuice in two tablespoons of water at night and pain in your lower belly or perineum).
—–
Current damage from sea level rise is not just about islands. A new climate science report (900 pages long) from China reveals that 86 million people in that country live on land which is at risk of flooding or inundation from the ocean. Serious damage is already visible, as viewed and discussed here.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/rising-waters-prompt-chinas-sea-change-onclimate/article27608966/
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/rising-waters-prompt-chinas-sea-change-onclimate/article27608966/
—–
A broader discussion of sea level rise and how it should apply to the Paris proceedings has a good review by Chris Mooney in the Washington Post. Reasons are given for why the US could have effects much worse than what people ordinarily expect, and worse than for most other parts of the world.
—–
New thinking about the “medieval warm period.” More findings support the idea that the warmth was regional, or even semi-regional, and not found all over the globe. Peter Sinclair has put this story together quite well, with helpful videos.
—–
The economics of carbon capture and storage. The news keeps getting worse, in terms of both actual costs and even the nature of the concepts often promoted. This is not something one should have hopes for, and meanwhile the alternative of pressing ahead with renewables keeps improving.
—–
Comparing Exxon’s current stance on climate change to that of the GOP. Exxon is far ahead with respect to accepting the facts that have been thoroughly studied and established by science. How can the GOP get away with persistently claiming the science is all a hoax or a left-wing scam? This subject is getting more attention almost daily, and because it is so absurd I think that will continue right up until the next election.
Carl