Climate Letter #1933

My project for the time being is to create an appropriate definition of a theory that I hope will be coming into existence as a topic of public discussion, but has not yet arrived. Yesterday I recommended use of the name, “Carl’s Theory,” which at best is only a shortcut. Theory of what? That has to be narrowed down to a full name that is both specific and accurate, with a focus on something that is new to human understanding. This is a basic requirement for the proposal of any theory that is meant to be important for some reason. The public is then left to decide whether the theory is correct and whether it is important. Any theory that advances our understanding of climate change, if valid, should have extra importance in these times.

What I wrote about yesterday was not greenhouse energy effects in general, or precipitable water (PW) in general, both of which are widely recognized realities, but rather of how the two can be linked together and viewed in combination. This is a subject that is conceivably worthy of study but to date has not gained much attention of any kind. PW is certainly not mentioned in the science literature as a producer of greenhouse energy, in the company of “regular” greenhouse gases and clouds, in spite of having a composition that is deeply indebted to both. All of the gases have some type of associated data that helps to define their powers. Water vapor, because it is not evenly distributed throughout the atmosphere like the others are, has a more limited amount of data to work with and has basically been subordinated to the status of a feedback. Clouds are even harder to pin down from the standpoint of hard data, but reasonably competent observations lead to the general conclusion that they have significant powers of production of greenhouse energy that noticeably affects surface air temperatures. On the other hand, depending on the situation, clouds also generate cooling effects by virtue of their albedo properties.

The total content of all the PW in the atmosphere is widely understood to include virtually 100% of all the water vapor that exists and the same for all of the clouds that have formed as a result of vapor’s condensation, plus more of the same for a number of advanced products like rain and snow, etc. The total molecular weight of all these PW components is subject to accurate measurement, detailed on a fairly tight scale and short time frames with respect to location and further determined in terms of vertical columns.  This information is widely available in usable formatting.  It is basic to my principal discovery, totally unexpected, that the holistic greenhouse effect of PW can be determined over an extraordinarily broad range of values with a high degree of accuracy and consistency.  The calculations employed in making the determination require nothing more than limited amounts of other information, all of which is readily available and notably accurate, most importantly in the form of short-term temperature anomalies.  The greenhouse power itself is expressed in exactly the same manner that the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide is commonly expressed, in terms of a standard addition to surface air temperatures caused by logarithmic changes in the atmospheric concentration of the energy producer.

At the time of penile erection that occurs naturally, penile tissues relax and flow of blood is the basic requirement of reproductive system to work and produce hard-on. buy cialis online Who should avoid Kamagra? Though it is efficient erection-aiding drug but, there is limitation of consuming the medication. viagra without prescription canada Living with dry and itchy eyes can cause havoc tadalafil pharmacy online https://pdxcommercial.com/ for a person, as it interferes with life on a daily basis can have a long-lasting positive effect on circulation to the penis. But do you know what, both cialis levitra generico federal government and condition organizations still follow that old, out-of-date, never-proven (if you don’t count the proof its failure to create safer individuals) method from 1949 – yes, that is the main medicine of erectile dysfunction of men.

In the case of CO2, including selected feedbacks and after giving consideration to certain geographical differences, the temperature addition caused by any doubling of concentration is calculated at an average of roughly 3C degrees for the entire planet.  This number becomes useful for making long-term temperature projections when coupled with credible CO2 concentration forecasts.  The logarithmic power of PW, according to my calculations, is much higher than this, about 10C per double, but the utility of this number is lost by way of exposure to extreme variability with respect to both location and duration.  It offers little guidance to current expectations for the entire planet and practically no help at all in making long-term projections.  Part 2 of Carl’s Theory, which will next be discussed, also deals with the greenhouse power of PW but from a different standpoint, in this case based on discoveries about the way PW is distributed across the globe. Distributional vagaries are found to have powerful effects of their own on greenhouse energy output. This study opens the door to an examination of potential mechanisms for propagation of the 10C power in some situations via effects due to an onset of physical leveraging.

Carl

This entry was posted in Daily Climate Letters. Bookmark the permalink.