New records were set by Hurricane Ophelia. Most had to do with its location. One other, which may be even more important: “Ophelia is the tenth tropical storm in a row that has turned into a hurricane, something that has never happened in the era of monitoring hurricanes with airplanes.” Doesn’t that upward step point to an increase in frequency for hurricanes?
Smoking does considerable damage to a man with erectile dysfunction (ED) loses interest and confidence in making love. cialis brand secretworldchronicle.com Missed dosed: Non specific generic cialis 5mg is utilized just as required, hence missed measurements are not important. I lived free viagra without prescription it firsthand and observe it in couples coast-to-coast. It can be caused by a physical condition and that caused by a psychological the cheapest cialis condition.
—–
Wind also has a positive side, and it’s getting lots of attention. The Guardian has a story about the virtually unlimited potential of wind power, which could provide for all of the world’s energy needs at a bargain price.
—–
Implementation of biochar technology binds CO2 from the air and improves soil. It could potentially reduce about 12% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions and bolster food supplies anywhere in the world. There are people actively promoting such an effort but it still has a long way to go. This post explains how it works.
—–
From Nature Conservancy, a whole set of ways to fight climate change through better management of the way we use land. Their approach puts highest emphasis on protecting and rebuilding forests, followed by better agricultural practices and peatland management. The equivalent of one-third of current CO2 emissions could be eliminated each year in a cost-effective way. With no limit on costs they say that figure could actually be doubled, which, if true, is an amazing possibility on top of whatever gains can be produced by eliminating the burning of fossil fuels, and without even mentioning geoengineering. Somebody still has to make it all happen!
–Don’t miss this quote: Dr. William H. Schlesinger, Professor Emeritus of Biogeochemistry and former president of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, said: “This study is the first attempt to estimate systematically the amount of carbon that might be sequestered from the atmosphere by various actions in forestry and agriculture, and by the preservation of natural lands which store carbon very efficiently. The results are provocative: first, because of the magnitude of potential carbon sequestration from nature, and second, because we need natural climate solutions in tandem with rapid fossil fuel emissions cuts to beat climate change.”
Poor countries especially vulnerable to climate change damage are not getting much help. The UN has a mechanism in place but it is poorly funded and executed. This post from Climate Home explains the rising need and why current practices must change. Governments denying that climate change is manmade can use that argument as an excuse not to cough up their fair share of the necessary funding.