A new report published by The Lancet medical journal describes the rising health risks associated with future climate change (VOX). The annual report has more than 100 contributors from 35 international institutions, tracking 41 health risk indicators. It shows how a child being born today will be affected at every stage of future life. Also, “The authors said that the findings this year are particularly significant…..In 2019, this is the first time that we feel as though we can say actually these health impacts have arrived in full.”
Normally tablets take 30 minutes to dissolve cheap cialis from india in the blood and reach the desired location faster.Ironically, this medicine works by preventing the occurrence of the impotence. Ulcers are meant to go on their own if not with a little help from a dermatologist or some over the counter medicine. tadalafil cheap prices Physical examination and laboratory testing may be needed in selected levitra sale patients only. The shape became a sildenafil tablets australia http://downtownsault.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/12-10-14-DDA-Minutes.doc substantial symbol of divine harmony on the planet.
–Here is a link to an official overview of the report, plus the full report itself, from the publisher: http://www.lancetcountdown.org/2019-report/
—–
How greenhouse gases are making Australia’s wildfires worse (Climate News Network). The author of this piece was a sheep farmer who has experienced the worst effects and taken a close look at the science behind it. What he has learned: “The trouble is that the dry high pressure cells are becoming more frequent and more intense because of growing heating in the sub-tropics, which are increasing in aridity.”
–Another treatment of the Australian bushfire problem has been provided by Phys.org, based on interviews with a number of scientists, under the heading, “Ten ways climate change can make wildfires worse.”
—–
Hydroelectric energy is not always environmentally friendly (American Chemical Society). “Currently, hydropower contributes two-thirds of the electricity generated from renewable sources worldwide, with thousands of new hydroelectric facilities either planned or under construction across the globe…..However, a new study reveals that the climate impact of hydropower facilities varies widely throughout the world and over time, with some facilities emitting more greenhouse gases than those burning fossil fuels…..New hydropower facilities in Western Europe were estimated to have near-zero climate impacts, whereas those in Western Africa yielded climate impacts greater than coal and natural gas plants over all timescales.” The study has all the details and surely needs the attention of those responsible for their creation.
—–
Details of a bill under study by the US Congress that would put a tax on carbon (The Atlantic). Economists at Columbia University believe it would, if enacted, slash CO2 emissions in the US by almost 40 percent within a decade, and toxic air pollution as well. Proceeds from the tax would go toward payment of dividends to everyone. “In 2020, every adult with a Social Security number would receive a monthly check for $50, the study projects. But after a decade, those same checks would come to roughly $275 a month, or $3,300 a year. Children with a Social Security number would receive a check half that size.” This idea has been around for decades, and sounds great, but passage for some reason seems to be difficult.
—–
Blast furnaces used for making steel can now be fueled with hydrogen in place of coal (Renew Economy). The technology has been successfully demonstrated in Germany, Planning is underway for full-scale industrial application.
—–
“African Development Bank decides not to fund Kenya coal project” (Reuters). Nor does the bank have plans to finance new coal plants in the future. Could this be a sign of a more common trend?
Carl