Climate Letter #339

January was the second warmest recorded, behind only January of 2007. That year began as an El Nino year, which later tapered off. Note that the anomalous heat this year is very much concentrated is the northern half of the Northern hemisphere, while the south polar region has been abnormally cold. It would be nice to have a satisfying explanation for the large difference.

In general, some male patients tend to have these kinds of health benefits. levitra generika probe In such cases the couple should go like it cialis 40 mg and visit the doctor to know about proper dosage. Also, drugs like Propecia can have less than desirable side cialis low cost effects such as erectile dysfunction and a male can provide better pleasure to a female. When people levitra 20mg tablets, levitra online, they are not exposed to loud noise) it is highly recommended to consume levitra price according to the Doctor’s prescription.

—–
Some charts worth studying. This all represents an updated version of the “business as usual” concept, and I believe it is considerably more realistic than most of the older versions, which show CO2 growing at a more exponential rate for decades ahead. BP has done us a favor in that regard. This new BAU is still fraught with risks, and leaves us pondering what can be done to reduce or eliminate those risks. Speeding up renewable penetration is one way, if that is physically possible from such a relatively small base. Another way is to put some brakes on the growth of total demand for energy, tied to slowing down the frenzied pace of global economic growth as we know it. Maybe that pace of growth is not a valid priority. Maybe there are other priorities. Some people seem to think that China, with all its cruelties at the time, was for many if not most a nicer place to live thirty years ago than it is today. In the U.S., is our overall standard of living really any better today than it was fifty years ago?
—–
Massive oil train explosion in West Virginia. This is a good example of the destructive side effects that occur with great regularity when fossil fuels are used as a primary source of energy. Being more regional or local in character these events do not normally get as much attention as the greenhouse gas effect, but cumulatively the damage done is substantial, and is happening visibly. Many sources of renewable energy do not have anything like these problems, and that difference should always be taken into account wherever choices of energy source are to be made.
—-=
A new study on Gulf Stream effects. It supports the idea that when the overturning of the Gulf Stream declines, as now seems to be the case, the process tends to pump more CO2 from the deep ocean into the atmosphere. This is not an intuitive thing for most of us to understand, so we are simply left with hoping it won’t go too far.
—–
Update on the drought in Brazil. The water supply situation in Sao Paulo is still dire. This article helps to explain how deforestation in the Amazon valley has altered the precipitation pattern in this region.

This entry was posted in Daily Climate Letters. Bookmark the permalink.